본문으로 건너뛰기
DispatchAtlas
검색

벤치마크 모델

dispatchatlas.bench는 솔버나 캠페인이 소비하기 전에 벤치마크 증거를 정의합니다. 벤치마크 패밀리는 그 분류법, 도메인 프로파일, 프로파일 클래스, 가정, 인용 증거, 규모 외피, 시드 네임스페이스, 그리고 출력 스키마를 선언합니다. 물질화는 생성된 각 문제를 dispatchatlas.core로 검증하고, 인스턴스를 특성화하며, 출처 봉투로 감싸고, 안정적 해시를 기록합니다.

카탈로그는 범용 조합-최적화 스케줄링 패밀리와 distributed-computing 스케줄링을 co-equal한 동급으로 포괄하므로, 플랫폼은 distributed-computing-전용 도구가 아닙니다.

실행 가능한 예제: examples/benchmark_continuum.py는 연속체 벤치마크 아틀라스를 즉석에서 생성·특성화·카탈로그화합니다.

스케줄링 패밀리

각 스케줄링 패밀리는 최소 하나의 생성기 프로파일을 가진 일급 카탈로그 동급으로 물질화됩니다. 아래 카탈로그 표는 벤치마크 생성기 레지스트리와 인용 매트릭스에서 생성되므로, 그 패밀리 합계와 출처 인용은 행 자체에서 셀 수 있습니다. 표 위의 패밀리-분포 차트는 패밀리 프로파일이 스케줄링-패밀리 범주에 걸쳐 어떻게 퍼져 있는지 보여줍니다.

Generated from the benchmark generator registry and the citation matrix: 69 family profiles across 8 scheduling families distributed-computing (47), flow-shop (7), job-shop (6), machine-scheduling (3), open-shop (1), rcpsp (3), rcpsp-max (1), setup-flow-shop (1).

Benchmark family distributiondistributed-computing47flow-shop7job-shop6machine-scheduling3rcpsp3open-shop1rcpsp-max1setup-flow-shop1
How the 69 benchmark families distribute across scheduling-family categories — the IoE / Edge–Fog–Cloud continuum families dominate, while the classical combinatorial-scheduling families (job-shop, flow-shop, machine-scheduling, RCPSP, setup flow-shop) demonstrate the corpus’s reach into general scheduling. Hover or focus a bar to read its count.

Showing 69 of 69 family profiles.

Benchmark families — 69 rows, build-inlined from the public family bundle.
Distinctive againstEvidenceCitation statusSource citations
accelerator-coscheduling
accelerator-coscheduling
a heterogeneous datacenter job needs a compute resource and a scarce accelerator at the same time, so every job co-allocates two simultaneous resource demands held together for its whole run; the accelerator pool is scarce, so jobs sharing an accelerator serialize on it while jobs on disjoint resources run in parallel, and the scheduler reasons over a multi-resource co-allocation problem rather than a single-unit-demand one
distributed-computingioe-completepublished single-resource continuum schedulers (one unit resource demand per task, not the simultaneous co-allocation of a compute resource and a scarce accelerator held together under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
  • ghodsi-drf-2011 Ghodsi, Zaharia, Hindman, Konwinski, Shenker, and Stoica, USENIX NSDI 2011.
  • gandiva-2018 Xiao et al., USENIX OSDI 2018, 595-610.
aerial-edge
aerial-edge
a loitering UAV is a flying fog node that serves the ground region beneath it for a fixed loiter window before moving to the next pass, so sorties group into successive loiter passes pinned to the fog tier the platform embodies while overhead
distributed-computingioe-completeaerial-edge MEC simulators (no flying-fog loiter placement)smokecitation-backed
  • edgecloudsim-2018 Sonmez, Ozgovde, and Ersoy, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 29(11):e3493, 2018.
  • aerial-mec-survey-2022 Song, Qin, Hao, Hou, Wang, and Sun, arXiv:2208.13965, 2022.
anytime-inference
anytime-inference
an edge accelerator serves deep-learning inference requests that each complete a mandatory minimal-accuracy early-exit branch and may run an optional refinement to full accuracy when their latency deadline allows; every request declares a mandatory duration below its full duration and a tight latency deadline, and arrivals are spaced shorter than a full inference so requests queue and contend, so the scheduler decides which requests refine and which deliver the early-exit result -- an imprecise-computation quality-versus-timeliness trade-off
distributed-computingioe-completepublished edge-cloud split inference and datacenter inference serving (a fixed full-accuracy computation per request), neither of which lets a request drop an optional refinement to meet its deadline so the schedule order trades accuracy for timelinesssmokecitation-backed
blocking-flow-shop
blocking-flow-shop
flow-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
bulk-synchronous-graph
bulk-synchronous-graph
an iterative graph computation runs as a sequence of supersteps separated by global barriers, so each superstep's vertex partitions compute and exchange messages and every partition of the next superstep waits on all partitions of the prior one; the slowest partition therefore gates each superstep, and the scheduler reasons over a barrier-synchronized partition-balancing problem rather than an overlap-friendly pipeline or an independent-task one
distributed-computingioe-completepublished pipeline or independent-task schedulers (an overlap-friendly wavefront or unsynchronized tasks, not supersteps separated by global barriers where the slowest partition gates each round under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
  • valiant-bsp-1990 Valiant, Communications of the ACM, 33(8):103-111, 1990.
  • pregel-2010 Malewicz, Austern, Bik, Dehnert, Horn, Leiser, and Czajkowski, ACM SIGMOD 2010, 135-146.
carbon-aware
carbon-aware
flexible jobs defer to low-carbon-intensity windows under a time-varying grid carbon signal while honoring their SLA deadlines
distributed-computingioe-completeElectricity-Maps grid carbon-intensity and CityLearn carbon-aware community signalssmokecitation-backed
  • electricity-maps-grid-ci Electricity Maps, electricitymaps-contrib (open-source parsers and public grid carbon-intensity data).
  • citylearn-v2 Nweye, Kaspar, Buscemi, et al., 2024 (arXiv:2405.03848); Vazquez-Canteli et al., ACM BuildSys 2019.
cloud-independent
cloud-edge-independent
distributed-computingdomain-specificsmokecitation-backed
  • cloudsim-2011 Calheiros, Ranjan, Beloglazov, De Rose, and Buyya, Software: Practice and Experience, 2011.
  • dynamic-cloudsim-2015 Bux and Leser, Future Generation Computer Systems, 2015.
  • edge-vision-2016 Shi, Cao, Zhang, Li, and Xu, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2016.
coflow-scheduling
coflow-scheduling
a distributed-computing stage completes only when the last network transfer of its coflow lands, not the first, so a coflow's completion time is the maximum over its member flows; every coflow emits data-heavy flow tasks that place freely across the fabric plus a barrier task that depends on all of them, so the barrier gates the group and the coflow-completion-time is an all-or-nothing footprint
distributed-computingioe-completedatacenter coflow schedulers (no continuum tier-placement barrier)smokecitation-backed
compact-job-shop
compact-job-shop
job-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • or-library-1990 Beasley, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11):1069-1072, 1990.
  • taillard-1993 Taillard, European Journal of Operational Research, 1993.
confidential-edge
confidential-edge
tasks are classified by data sensitivity -- a confidential task that touches protected data must execute inside the enclave-capable trusted tier so its data never leaves the trusted boundary, while a public task draws a free placement affinity across the fabric
distributed-computingioe-completeedge enclave runtimes (no security-classified Pareto placement)smokecitation-backed
  • occlum-asplos-2020 Shen, Tian, Chen, Chen, Wang, Xu, Yan, and Xia, International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) 2020.
  • confidential-edge-zobaed-2025 Zobaed and Amini Salehi, Software: Practice and Experience, 2025.
cyber-physical
cyber-physical
control cycles arrive periodically under a time-varying tariff
distributed-computingioe-completeperiodic hard-real-time task models and smart-grid demand-side scheduling formulations (no edge-fog-cloud tier placement under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
  • liu-layland-1973 Liu and Layland, Journal of the ACM, 20(1):46-61, 1973.
  • smart-grid-dsm-2012 Logenthiran, Srinivasan, and Shun, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3(3):1244-1252, 2012.
  • citylearn-v2 Nweye, Kaspar, Buscemi, et al., 2024 (arXiv:2405.03848); Vazquez-Canteli et al., ACM BuildSys 2019.
data-locality
data-locality
a query over a large dataset is cheaper to run where the data already resides than to ship the data across the WAN fabric; each task's input lives on one tier (edge sensor logs, fog warm aggregates, or cloud cold archives) and the task pins to that tier so its heavy input never crosses the fabric, with the data tiers cycled so placement spans the whole edge-fog-cloud continuum
distributed-computingioe-completecluster locality schedulers (no continuum data-residency placement)smokecitation-backed
datacenter-colocation
datacenter-colocation
latency-sensitive service jobs and deferrable batch jobs share multi-tenant cells, so high-priority-band jobs claim capacity ahead of low-band jobs under contention
distributed-computingioe-completeGoogle Borg ClusterData2019 priority-tiered cell tracessmokecitation-backed
  • google-cluster-data Reiss, Wilkes, and Hellerstein, Google cluster-usage traces, 2011; Wilkes, ClusterData2019 v3, 2020.
  • borg-2020 Tirmazi, Barker, Deng, Haque, Qin, Hand, Harchol-Balter, and Wilkes, EuroSys 2020.
digital-twin-sync
digital-twin-sync
each physical asset periodically syncs its state to its fog/cloud twin and must finish within a freshness (Age-of-Information) window before the twin's state goes stale
distributed-computingioe-completedigital-twin edge frameworks (no joint Pareto placement)smokecitation-backed
  • digital-twin-diten-2022 Tang, Chen, Koketsu Rodrigues, Zhao, and Kato, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 3:1360-1381, 2022.
disaggregated-memory
disaggregated-memory
a CXL-pooled cloud platform backs each socket with a small local DRAM tier and a shared far-memory pool, and every VM draws a long-tailed memory working set, so a few memory-hungry tenants dominate a socket's local budget while far-memory access inflates a VM's runtime in proportion to the working set it spills to the pool; the scheduler reasons over local-versus-pool placement rather than core-count placement
distributed-computingioe-completepublished CXL memory-pooling and tiered-memory systems (socket-local page placement, no edge-fog-cloud tier scheduling under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
  • pond-cxl-2023 Li, Berger, Hsu, Ernst, Zardoshti, Novakovic, Shah, Rajadnya, Lee, Agarwal, Hill, Fontoura, and Bianchini, ASPLOS 2023.
  • tpp-cxl-2023 Maruf, Wang, Dhanotia, Weiner, Agarwal, Bhattacharya, Petersen, Chowdhury, Kanaujia, and Chauhan, ASPLOS 2023.
distributed-assembly-flow-shop
distributed-assembly-flow-shop
flow-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • hatami-ruiz-2013 Hatami, Ruiz, and Andrés-Romano, International Journal of Production Research, 51(17):5292-5308, 2013.
  • taillard-1993 Taillard, European Journal of Operational Research, 1993.
distributed-flexible-job-shop
distributed-flexible-job-shop
job-shopstructurally-complexsmokecitation-backed
distributed-permutation-flow-shop
distributed-permutation-flow-shop
flow-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • naderi-ruiz-2010 Naderi and Ruiz, Computers & Operations Research, 37(4):754-768, 2010.
  • taillard-1993 Taillard, European Journal of Operational Research, 1993.
distributed-training-gang
distributed-training-gang
a GPU cluster runs synchronous data-parallel training jobs; each job is a gang of workers that must START TOGETHER on distinct accelerators (every all-reduce step synchronizes the workers), so a job cannot begin until enough accelerators are free simultaneously; the workers reuse the accelerator pool and jobs arrive over time, so jobs queue and the scheduler decides which job acquires a full simultaneously-free worker set first -- an all-or-nothing gang co-start, not an independent placement of each worker
distributed-computingioe-completepublished GPU-cluster and inference-serving families that place each task independently; none requires a whole job's worker set to co-start simultaneously on distinct accelerators, so no other family forbids a partial start -- the gang-scheduling all-or-nothing constraint under a Pareto contractsmokecitation-backed
  • gang-scheduling-1995 Feitelson and Rudolph, Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing (JSSPP), LNCS 949, Springer, 1995, 1-18.
  • large-minibatch-sgd-2017 Goyal, Dollar, Girshick, Noordhuis, Wesolowski, Kyrola, Tulloch, Jia, and He, arXiv:1706.02677, 2017.
distributed-transaction
distributed-transaction
a partitioned database runs transactions that each acquire exclusive locks on a variable read/write set of data shards, so every transaction co-allocates a randomly drawn subset of shards held together for its whole run; two transactions whose shard sets intersect serialize while disjoint transactions commit in parallel, so the scheduler reasons over a variable-cardinality lock-conflict graph rather than a fixed two-resource hold
distributed-computingioe-completepublished replica-placement schedulers (a single shard pinned per task for locality, not a variable-cardinality exclusive lock set co-allocated per transaction forming a conflict graph under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
  • calvin-2012 Thomson, Diamond, Weng, Ren, Shao, and Abadi, ACM SIGMOD 2012.
  • spanner-2012 Corbett et al., USENIX OSDI 2012.
edge-offloading
edge-offloading-mec
each task chooses between local edge execution and remote offload
distributed-computingioe-completeiFogSim MEC offloading scenariossmokecitation-backed
  • ifogsim-2017 Gupta, Vahid Dastjerdi, Ghosh, and Buyya, Software: Practice and Experience, 47(9):1275-1296, 2017.
  • ifogsim2-2022 Mahmud, Pallewatta, Goudarzi, and Buyya, Journal of Systems and Software, 190:111351, 2022.
  • edge-vision-2016 Shi, Cao, Zhang, Li, and Xu, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2016.
  • shanghai-telecom-edge Wang, Guo, Zhang, Yang, Zhou, and Shen, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 20(3):939-953, 2021.
edge-placement
edge-placement
services place on edge servers near their user population and migrate as demand shifts across base-station coverage cells
distributed-computingioe-completeEUA edge-user-allocation and Shanghai-Telecom base-station placement tracessmokecitation-backed
  • eua-dataset Lai, He, Abdelrazek, Chen, Bao, Grundy, Hosking, and Yang, ICSOC 2018.
  • shanghai-telecom-edge Wang, Guo, Zhang, Yang, Zhou, and Shen, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 20(3):939-953, 2021.
elastic-serverless-autoscale
elastic-serverless-autoscale
a serverless platform serves function invocations on a shared worker pool, and every invocation is moldable: it may run on one, two, or four concurrent workers, where a wider allocation runs shorter by a sublinear speedup but spends more total worker-seconds; each request declares its execution modes and arrivals are spaced shorter than a base invocation so the pool is contended, so the scheduler picks each invocation's worker width -- a moldable latency-versus-cost choice rather than a fixed resource hold
distributed-computingioe-completepublished serverless cold-start and fixed-width co-allocation families (accelerator co-scheduling, fpga partitioning), each of which holds one fixed resource set per task; none lets a request choose among several worker-count modes so the schedule order trades latency for resource cost under a Pareto contractsmokecitation-backed
facility-assignment
facility-assignment
machine-schedulingclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • hooker-2007 Hooker, Operations Research, 55(3):588-602, 2007.
failure-recovery
failure-recovery
a failed task re-places its checkpoint state to a surviving tier
distributed-computingioe-completeBorg cluster failure-event tracessmokecitation-backed
  • google-cluster-data Reiss, Wilkes, and Hellerstein, Google cluster-usage traces, 2011; Wilkes, ClusterData2019 v3, 2020.
  • borg-2020 Tirmazi, Barker, Deng, Haque, Qin, Hand, Harchol-Balter, and Wilkes, EuroSys 2020.
federated-learning
federated-learning
each training round selects a subset of heterogeneous, straggler-prone edge clients that train on non-IID local data, then a fog or cloud aggregator combines their updates
distributed-computingioe-completeFedScale and Oort federated-learning device-participation benchmarkssmokecitation-backed
  • fedscale-2022 Lai, Dai, Singapuram, Liu, Zhu, Madhyastha, and Chowdhury, ICML 2022 (PMLR 162); arXiv:2105.11367.
  • oort-2021 Lai, Zhu, Madhyastha, and Chowdhury, USENIX OSDI 2021.
flexible-job-shop
flexible-job-shop
job-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
flow-shop
permutation-flow-shop
flow-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • taillard-1993 Taillard, European Journal of Operational Research, 1993.
  • vallada-ruiz-framinan-2015 Vallada, Ruiz, and Framinan, European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3):666-677, 2015.
fpga-partitioning
fpga-partitioning
a multi-tenant reconfigurable FPGA hosts tenant kernels that each occupy a contiguous region of fabric tiles, so every kernel co-allocates a contiguous run of tiles held together for its whole residency; two kernels whose tile intervals overlap cannot be co-resident and serialize while kernels on disjoint tile spans run in parallel, so the scheduler reasons over an interval-overlap conflict graph rather than a fixed two-resource hold or a random-subset lock set
distributed-computingioe-completepublished accelerator co-scheduling (a fixed compute-plus-accelerator pair) and shard-lock transactions (a random subset of resources), neither of which constrains the co-allocated set to a spatially contiguous tile interval whose overlaps form an interval conflict graph under a Pareto contractsmokecitation-backed
frontierco-fjsp
frontierco-fjsp
job-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • frontierco Feng, Sun, Li, Talwalkar, and Yang, arXiv:2505.16952, 2026 (ICLR 2026).
  • behnke-geiger-2012 Behnke and Geiger, Helmut-Schmidt-University Hamburg working paper, 2012.
  • naderi-roshanaei-2022 Naderi and Roshanaei, INFORMS Journal on Optimization, 4(1):1-28, 2022.
generative-inference-serving
generative-inference-serving
a transformer inference replica batches autoregressive requests that each hold key-value-cache memory proportional to their token count for the whole decode, so a long-tailed sequence mix fragments a fixed cache budget and the scheduler reasons over memory-bound admission rather than GPU-count placement; every request's decode duration and KV-cache demand scale with its drawn token count
distributed-computingioe-completepublished single-replica generative-model serving systems (no edge-fog-cloud tier placement under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
gpu-ml
gpu-ml
training and inference jobs claim accelerators and gang-schedule replicas
distributed-computingioe-completeAlibaba PAI, Philly, and Helios GPU-cluster tracessmokecitation-backed
hybrid-flow-shop
hybrid-flow-shop
flow-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • ruiz-vazquez-2010 Ruiz and Vázquez-Rodríguez, European Journal of Operational Research, 205(1):1-18, 2010.
  • taillard-1993 Taillard, European Journal of Operational Research, 1993.
immersive-xr
immersive-xr
each extended-reality frame runs a latency-critical perception, render, and display pipeline placed across the device, edge, and cloud within a hard motion-to-photon deadline
distributed-computingioe-completeILLIXR extended-reality systems testbedsmokecitation-backed
  • illixr-2021 Huzaifa, Desai, Grayson, et al., IEEE IISWC 2021.
intermittent-edge
intermittent-edge
a batteryless sensor harvests ambient energy into a small buffer, runs until the buffer depletes, then sleeps to recharge; a job too large for one duty-cycle window is checkpointed at power loss and resumed in the next, so it is a precedence chain of edge-pinned per-window segments each bounded by the constant energy window
distributed-computingioe-completeintermittent-computing runtimes (no continuum energy-window placement)smokecitation-backed
iot-edge
iot-edge
many small sensor readings arrive periodically and aggregate at the edge
distributed-computingioe-completepublished wireless-sensor-network telemetry datasets and in-network aggregation deployments (raw sensor readings, not edge-fog-cloud tier scheduling under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
  • intel-lab-data Bodik, Hong, Guestrin, Madden, Paskin, and Thibaux, Intel Berkeley Research Lab / MIT CSAIL, 2004.
  • milano-cdr-2015 Barlacchi, De Nadai, Larcher, et al., Scientific Data, 2:150055, 2015.
job-shop
job-shop
job-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • or-library-1990 Beasley, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11):1069-1072, 1990.
  • taillard-1993 Taillard, European Journal of Operational Research, 1993.
  • applegate-cook-1991 Applegate and Cook, ORSA Journal on Computing, 3(2):149-156, 1991.
  • demirkol-mehta-uzsoy-1998 Demirkol, Mehta, and Uzsoy, European Journal of Operational Research, 109(1):137-141, 1998.
  • storer-wu-vaccari-1992 Storer, Wu, and Vaccari, Management Science, 38(10):1495-1509, 1992.
  • rl4co-2023 Berto, Hua, Park, et al., arXiv:2306.17100, 2023 (KDD 2025).
kv-cache-placement
kv-cache-placement
a distributed key-value cache tier serves a catalog of cache objects whose request rate follows a heavy Zipfian popularity skew, so a few hot objects absorb most of the traffic; each object is placement-flexible, carrying one single-node mode per cache-tier node, so the scheduler chooses which tier node hosts it, and an object's working set -- the transfer volume staged onto its host tier -- scales with its popularity rank, so the hottest object carries the largest working set and a cold-tail object the smallest; a naive uniform placement strands a hot, large-working-set object on a far tier and pays its transfer across the fabric, while a locality-aware placement pins the hottest objects to near tiers to shrink makespan and cost
distributed-computingioe-completepublished cache and content-placement families (consistent-hashing replica placement, CDN content distribution) that place each object uniformly or by a hash; none scales each object's working set with a Zipfian popularity rank so the hot objects carry a strictly larger transfer volume, making popularity-skewed near-tier pinning the lever a locality-aware placement pulls under the Pareto contractsmokecitation-backed
machine-scheduling
machine-scheduling-unrelated
machine-schedulingclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • or-library-1990 Beasley, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11):1069-1072, 1990.
microservice-dag
microservice-dag
services form an acyclic call graph pinned by role to a tier
distributed-computingioe-completeAlibaba v2021 microservice-trace call graphssmokecitation-backed
mixed-criticality
mixed-criticality
a safety-critical real-time mix runs tasks of differing criticality, and a high-criticality task is budgeted with a conservative high-assurance worst-case execution time and a tight deadline while a low-criticality task carries a smaller best-effort budget and a loose deadline, so the criticality tiering lives in the duration and deadline structure; the scheduler reasons over which assured-criticality tasks to guarantee under contention rather than a uniform-assurance deadline-scheduling one
distributed-computingioe-completepublished uniform-assurance real-time deadline schedulers (one worst-case execution time and deadline class per task, not criticality-tiered WCET budgets with tighter high-assurance deadlines under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
moe-expert-parallel
moe-expert-parallel
a sparsely-activated mixture-of-experts model routes each token batch to one expert and the experts are spread across devices, and expert popularity is long-tailed, so a few hot experts receive most token batches while many stay cold and the all-to-all routing exchange dominates fabric traffic; the scheduler reasons over an expert-placement and load-balancing problem rather than a dense uniform-replica serving one
distributed-computingioe-completepublished dense generative-model serving systems (uniform per-replica KV-cache admission, not sparse token-to-expert routing under load imbalance and a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
multi-objective-pfsp
multi-objective-pfsp
flow-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • minella-ruiz-2008 Minella, Ruiz, and Ciavotta, INFORMS Journal on Computing, 20(3):451-471, 2008.
  • taillard-1993 Taillard, European Journal of Operational Research, 1993.
multi-project-rcpsp
multi-project-rcpsp
rcpspstructurally-complexsmokecitation-backed
  • van-eynde-vanhoucke-2020 Van Eynde and Vanhoucke, Journal of Scheduling, 23(3):301-325, 2020.
  • psplib-1997 Kolisch and Sprecher, European Journal of Operational Research, 96(1):205-216, 1997.
multi-tenant-fair-share
multi-tenant-fair-share
a shared cluster serves several tenants whose workloads compete for one node pool; each task is placement-flexible, carrying one single-node mode per pool node, so the scheduler chooses which node it occupies; tenants are sized asymmetrically, so even a load-balanced placement leaves the heavy tenants holding a larger fraction of their busiest node -- a higher dominant resource share -- than the light ones, and a fairness-aware scheduler rebalances placement to shrink the dominant-share spread
distributed-computingioe-completepublished multi-tenant colocation families (Borg-style priority colocation, vm allocation) that fix each task's resource and score makespan or cost; none lets the scheduler choose each tenant task's node and scores the dominant-resource-share spread between tenants as a fairness objectivesmokecitation-backed
  • ghodsi-drf-2011 Ghodsi, Zaharia, Hindman, Konwinski, Shenker, and Stoica, USENIX NSDI 2011.
  • borg-2020 Tirmazi, Barker, Deng, Haque, Qin, Hand, Harchol-Balter, and Wilkes, EuroSys 2020.
network-slicing
network-slicing
isolated slice classes (latency-critical, broadband, massive-IoT) each carry their own service-level deadline and placement, and same-class slices spread across tiers for resilience
distributed-computingioe-complete5G slicing orchestration (no joint Pareto placement)smokecitation-backed
  • network-slicing-afolabi-2018 Afolabi, Taleb, Samdanis, Ksentini, and Flinck, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(3):2429-2453, 2018.
no-wait-flow-shop
no-wait-flow-shop
flow-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
open-shop
open-shop
open-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
orbital-edge
orbital-edge
tasks schedule across ground terminals, moving low-earth-orbit satellites, and cloud backhaul under time-varying connectivity as satellites enter and leave coverage and hand work over
distributed-computingioe-completeLENS real-measurement LEO satellite-network tracessmokecitation-backed
pipeline-parallel-training
pipeline-parallel-training
a deep network is split into successive pipeline stages pinned across edge-to-cloud tiers and the training mini-batch is divided into micro-batches, so each micro-batch flows forward stage by stage while each stage runs its micro-batches in issue order; the two precedence families form a diagonal wavefront whose warm-up and cool-down idle slots are the pipeline bubbles, and deeper stages carry rising compute, so the scheduler reasons over a stage-partition and bubble-minimizing problem rather than a synchronous data-parallel all-reduce one
distributed-computingioe-completepublished data-parallel / gang-scheduled training systems (synchronous all-reduce over co-located replicas, not a stage-by-micro-batch pipeline wavefront with warm-up and cool-down bubbles under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
  • gpipe-2019 Huang, Cheng, Bapna, Firat, Chen, Chen, Lee, Ngiam, Le, Wu, and Chen, NeurIPS 2019.
  • pipedream-2019 Narayanan, Harlap, Phanishayee, Seshadri, Devanur, Ganger, Gibbons, and Zaharia, SOSP 2019.
rcpsp
rcpsp-renewable
rcpspstructurally-complexsmokecitation-backed
  • psplib-1997 Kolisch and Sprecher, European Journal of Operational Research, 96(1):205-216, 1997.
rcpsp-max
rcpsp-max
rcpsp-maxstructurally-complexsmokecitation-backed
  • bartusch-moehring-1988 Bartusch, Möhring, and Radermacher, Annals of Operations Research, 16(1):199-240, 1988.
  • psplib-1997 Kolisch and Sprecher, European Journal of Operational Research, 96(1):205-216, 1997.
rcpsp-multi-mode
rcpsp-multi-mode
rcpspstructurally-complexsmokecitation-backed
  • van-peteghem-vanhoucke-2014 Van Peteghem and Vanhoucke, European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1):62-72, 2014.
  • psplib-1997 Kolisch and Sprecher, European Journal of Operational Research, 96(1):205-216, 1997.
reentrant-fab
reentrant-fab
job-shopstructurally-complexsmokecitation-backed
  • smt2020-2020 Kopp, Hassoun, Kalir, and Mönch, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 33(4):522-531, 2020.
replica-placement
replica-placement
a replica runs where its data shard already lives
distributed-computingioe-completeCRUSH replicated-data placementsmokecitation-backed
  • crush-2006 Weil, Brandt, Miller, and Maltzahn, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC'06), 2006.
  • google-cluster-data Reiss, Wilkes, and Hellerstein, Google cluster-usage traces, 2011; Wilkes, ClusterData2019 v3, 2020.
serverless-cold-start
serverless-cold-start
a cold invocation pays a container provisioning penalty
distributed-computingioe-completeAzure Functions serverless-in-the-wild tracessmokecitation-backed
  • azure-public-dataset Cortez et al., SOSP'17 Resource Central; Shahrad et al., USENIX ATC'20 Serverless in the Wild; Hadary et al., USENIX OSDI'20 Protean (AzureTracesForPacking2020).
  • sebs-2021 Copik, Kwasniewski, Besta, Podstawski, and Hoefler, ACM/IFIP Middleware 2021.
service-function-chain
service-function-chain
an NFV packet flow traverses a linear ordered chain of typed virtual network functions -- firewall, intrusion detection, deep packet inspection, address translation -- each pinned to a tier that hosts its function type, so the chain is a strict total order and the flow crosses the edge-fog-cloud fabric in a fixed sequence; the scheduler reasons over a chain-placement problem under an end-to-end latency budget rather than the branching role-pinned call graph of a microservice
distributed-computingioe-completepublished microservice call-graph schedulers (a branching role-pinned acyclic call graph, not a strict linear chain of function-typed network functions under an end-to-end latency budget and a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
  • nfv-survey-2016 Mijumbi, Serrat, Gorricho, Bouten, De Turck, and Boutaba, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(1):236-262, 2016.
  • sfc-placement-2014 Mehraghdam, Keller, and Karl, IEEE CloudNet 2014, 7-13.
setup-flow-shop
setup-flow-shop
setup-flow-shopclassicalsmokecitation-backed
  • allahverdi-survey-2008 Allahverdi, Ng, Cheng, and Kovalyov, European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3):985-1032, 2008.
  • allahverdi-survey-2015 Allahverdi, European Journal of Operational Research, 246(2):345-378, 2015.
smartnic-offload
smartnic-offload
a SmartNIC-accelerated server pairs a fast host CPU with a low-power on-NIC processor, and every microservice draws a long-tailed compute intensity, so most are light enough to offload onto the energy-frugal NIC cores while a few compute-heavy services must stay host-bound; a service's runtime scales with its intensity, so the scheduler reasons over an energy-versus-latency offload-placement problem rather than a uniform host placement one
distributed-computingioe-completepublished mobile-edge computation-offloading models (device-to-edge latency offload, not in-server host-to-NIC energy offload under a Pareto contract)smokecitation-backed
split-inference-serving
split-inference-serving
each inference request partitions a deep model at a layer cut -- a light head runs the early layers on the edge near the sensor and a heavy tail runs the later layers in the cloud, consuming the head's intermediate feature map under a per-request end-to-end latency SLO
distributed-computingioe-completedatacenter inference serving (no edge-cloud partition placement)smokecitation-backed
  • alpaserve-osdi-2023 Li, Zheng, Zhong, Liu, Sheng, Jin, Huang, Chen, Zhang, Gonzalez, and Stoica, USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI) 2023, 663-679.
  • neurosurgeon-asplos-2017 Kang, Hauswald, Gao, Rovinski, Mudge, Mars, and Tang, International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) 2017.
spot-preemptible
spot-preemptible
a cloud provider rents idle capacity at a discount as revocable spot instances reclaimed after a short lease; eviction-tolerant batch work pins to the cloud spot tier under a hard lease deadline (the eviction horizon), while latency-critical interactive work pins to the stable edge on-demand tier with no eviction deadline
distributed-computingioe-completecloud spot schedulers (no continuum eviction-deadline placement)smokecitation-backed
  • harvest-vms-ambati-osdi-2020 Ambati, Goiri, Frujeri, Gun, Wang, Dolan, Corell, Pasupuleti, Moscibroda, Elnikety, Fontoura, and Bianchini, USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI) 2020, 735-751.
  • spot-eviction-yang-www-2022 Yang, Pang, Zhang, Qiao, Wang, Couturier, Bansal, Ram, Qin, Ma, Goiri, Cortez, Baladhandayutham, Ruhle, Rajmohan, Lin, and Zhang, The Web Conference (WWW) 2022 Companion, 152-156.
storage-io-tiering
storage-io-tiering
a tiered storage pool serves I/O-bound jobs whose runtime is dominated by moving a job's I/O volume through the storage node it lands on; each job is placement-flexible, carrying one single-node mode per tier node, and the mode duration is tier-dependent -- a seek floor plus the I/O volume divided by that tier's I/O bandwidth, which differs by tier (a fast cloud array sustains far more bytes/second than a slow edge disk); a job's I/O volume follows a heavy-tailed falloff over its I/O-demand rank, so a few I/O-heavy jobs carry most of the bytes and have a large cross-tier duration spread, while the light tail barely varies; a naive placement strands an I/O-heavy job on a low-bandwidth tier and pays its volume slowly, while a bandwidth-aware placement pins the heavy jobs to fast tiers to shrink makespan and cost
distributed-computingioe-completepublished storage-tiering and hierarchical-storage-management families that migrate blocks between fast and slow tiers by access frequency; none models the heterogeneous-tier I/O bandwidth as a placement-flexible per-tier mode whose duration is the I/O volume divided by that tier's bandwidth, so an I/O-heavy job's cross-tier duration spread is the bottleneck-relief lever a bandwidth-aware placement pulls under the Pareto contractsmokecitation-backed
  • msr-cambridge-block-2008 Narayanan, Donnelly, and Rowstron, ACM Transactions on Storage 4(3):10, 2008 (USENIX FAST 2008); MSR Cambridge enterprise volume block-I/O trace via the SNIA IOTTA repository.
streaming-window
streaming-window
events arrive online in bounded windows and must close within one
distributed-computingioe-completeParallel Workloads Archive online arrivalssmokecitation-backed
  • parallel-workloads-archive Feitelson, Tsafrir, and Krakov, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 74(10):2967-2982, 2014.
  • dspbench-2020 Bordin, Griebler, Mencagli, Geyer, and Fernandes, IEEE Access, 8:222900-222917, 2020.
time-sensitive-networking
time-sensitive-networking
each time-triggered flow releases on a fixed period and must finish within one cycle under a hard, jitter-free deadline
distributed-computingioe-completeEdgeCloudSim best-effort scenarios (no gating)smokecitation-backed
  • tsn-craciunas-2016 Craciunas, Serna Oliver, Chmelik, and Steiner, RTNS 2016, ACM, 183-192.
  • edgecloudsim-2018 Sonmez, Ozgovde, and Ersoy, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 29(11):e3493, 2018.
unrelated-parallel-setup
unrelated-parallel-setup
machine-schedulingstructurally-complexsmokecitation-backed
  • vallada-ruiz-2011 Vallada and Ruiz, European Journal of Operational Research, 211(3):612-622, 2011.
  • allahverdi-survey-2015 Allahverdi, European Journal of Operational Research, 246(2):345-378, 2015.
vehicular-offloading
vehicular-offloading
a vehicle's tasks share an arrival time and a roadside-unit dwell deadline, and hand over from the roadside unit to the fog tier as the vehicle drives on
distributed-computingioe-completeEdgeCloudSim / SUMO vehicular-edge mobility scenariossmokecitation-backed
  • lust-scenario Codecà, Frank, Faye, and Engel, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 9(2):52-63, 2017.
  • edgecloudsim-2018 Sonmez, Ozgovde, and Ersoy, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 29(11):e3493, 2018.
video-analytics
video-analytics
each camera streams frames that must be analyzed within a tight real-time latency bound, placed hierarchically with edge inference near the camera and cloud aggregation
distributed-computingioe-completeedge video-analytics clusters (no joint Pareto placement)smokecitation-backed
  • videoedge-2018 Hung, Ananthanarayanan, Bodik, Golubchik, Yu, Bahl, and Philipose, ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC) 2018, 115-131.
vm-allocation
vm-allocation
size-heterogeneous virtual-machine deployments pack onto hosts while each deployment's members spread across distinct failure domains for availability
distributed-computingioe-completeAzure Public Dataset Resource Central VM-allocation tracessmokecitation-backed
  • azure-public-dataset Cortez et al., SOSP'17 Resource Central; Shahrad et al., USENIX ATC'20 Serverless in the Wild; Hadary et al., USENIX OSDI'20 Protean (AzureTracesForPacking2020).
  • bitbrains-gwa-t12-2015 Shen, van Beek, and Iosup, IEEE/ACM CCGrid 2015, pp. 465-474; Bitbrains (now Solvinity) datacenter VM trace via the Grid Workloads Archive (GWA-T-12).
  • materna-gwa-t13-2014 Kohne, Spohr, Nagel, and Spinczyk, ACM CCB@Middleware 2014; Materna GmbH datacenter VM trace via the Grid Workloads Archive (GWA-T-13).
  • planetlab-workload-2012 Beloglazov and Buyya, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 24(13):1397-1420, 2012; PlanetLab/CoMon CPU-utilization workload bundled with CloudSim.
workflow-dag
workflow-dag
distributed-computingstructurally-complexsmokecitation-backed
  • stg-task-graphs Tobita and Kasahara, Journal of Scheduling, 5(5):379-394, 2002.
  • wfcommons-pegasus-instances Coleman, Casanova, Pottier, Kaushik, Deelman, and Ferreira da Silva, Future Generation Computer Systems, 128:16-27, 2022.
  • topcuoglu-heft-2002 Topcuoglu, Hariri, and Wu, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 13(3):260-274, 2002.
  • canon-dag-bias-2019 Canon, El Sayah, and Héam, Euro-Par 2019, LNCS 11725.

Per-instance characterization and download eligibility live in the benchmark catalog; this table is the family-and-citation inventory.

위 컴포넌트는 완전한 생성 인벤토리를 담습니다 — 아래의 고전 및 distributed-computing 코어 패밀리에 더해 Edge–Fog–Cloud 패밀리의 연속체입니다. 그 기초적 코어 패밀리를 문서 형식으로:

패밀리프로파일프로파일 클래스주요 코퍼스
기계 스케줄링 (R||Cmax, 비관련 기계)machine-scheduling-unrelatedclassicalOR-Library
Job-shopjob-shop-classicalclassicalOR-Library, Taillard
유연 job-shop (FJSP)flexible-job-shopclassicalBrandimarte; Hurink-Jurisch-Thole
순열 플로우샵permutation-flow-shopclassicalTaillard
순서-의존 셋업 플로우샵 (SDST)setup-flow-shopclassicalAllahverdi et al. (2008); Allahverdi (2015)
자원-제약 프로젝트 스케줄링 (RCPSP)rcpsp-renewablestructurally-complexPSPLIB
Distributed-computing (cloud/edge)cloud-edge-capacitydomain-specificCloudSim; DynamicCloudSim; Edge vision
Distributed-computing (workflow DAG)workflow-dagstructurally-complexStandard Task Graph Set

비관련-기계 및 유연 job-shop 패밀리는 각 인스턴스에 CostModel 실행-시간 매트릭스를 부착하여, 문제 JSON과 함께 물질화 매트릭스로 내보냅니다. 순서-의존 셋업 플로우샵 패밀리는 대신 CostModel 셋업 매트릭스를 부착합니다: 한 기계에서 다른 패밀리의 작업 간 전환은 셋업 시간을 들이므로, 셋업 목적은 유사 작업의 그룹화를 보상합니다. 명명된 표준 코퍼스는 인용 및 링크만 되고 저장소 내에서 결코 재배포되지 않습니다.

여러 연속체 패밀리는 다중-자원 공동-할당을 행사합니다: 각 태스크는 한 번에 둘 이상의 자원을 요구하고 생성자는 그 전체 지속 동안 그것들을 함께 유지합니다(도메인 계약 참조). accelerator-coscheduling 패밀리는 작업당 컴퓨트 노드와 희소 가속기를 공동-할당합니다; distributed-transaction 패밀리는 트랜잭션당 데이터 샤드의 가변-기수 잠금 집합을 공동-할당합니다; 그리고 fpga-partitioning 패밀리는 테넌트 커널당 재구성 가능 패브릭 타일의 공간적으로 연속된 연속을 공동-할당합니다. 자원 집합이 교차하는 태스크는 직렬화되고, 서로소 태스크는 동시에 실행됩니다 — 실행 가능한 examples/inspect_coallocation.py가 그 레버를 명시화합니다.

공동-할당을 넘어, 세 연속체 패밀리는 각자의 구조적 레버를 행사합니다. elastic-serverless-autoscale 패밀리는 성형 가능 실행을 행사합니다: 각 함수 호출은 둘 이상의 실행 모드를 선언합니다 — 좁은 자택-전용 모드와, 더 일찍 끝내기 위해 작은 공유 버스트 풀에서 worker를 빌리는 넓은 모드 — 그래서 스케줄은 태스크당 한 모드를 고르고 순서가 어떤 호출이 희소한 넓고-빠른 모드를 차지하는지 결정합니다. distributed-training-gang 패밀리는 갱 공동-스케줄링을 행사합니다: 동기 데이터-병렬 훈련 작업의 workers는 갱을 공유하며 전부-아니면-전무 시작에서 별개 가속기 상에서 공동-시작해야 합니다 — workers는 가속기 풀을 재사용하고 작업은 시간에 걸쳐 도착하므로, 충분한 가속기가 동시에 비워질 때까지 작업이 시작될 수 없고, 순서가 어떤 작업이 그 완전한 worker 집합을 먼저 획득하는지 결정합니다. multi-tenant-fair-share 패밀리는 지배-자원 공정성을 행사합니다: 여러 비대칭-규모 테넌트가 공유 노드 풀 위에 배치-유연 태스크를 두고, 지배-자원-몫 목적이 가장 많이- 및 가장 적게-제공된 테넌트의 지배 몫 사이의 산포를 채점합니다 — 그래서 배치, 즉 각 테넌트가 어떤 자원을 점유하는지가 그것을 균형 잡거나 기울이는 레버입니다. 실행 가능한 examples/serverless_autoscale_study.py, examples/distributed_training_gang_study.py, 그리고 examples/multi_tenant_fairshare_study.py가 이 세 레버를 명시화합니다.

프로파일 클래스

프로파일 클래스의미
classical표준 조합-최적화 코퍼스에서 파생됨.
structurally-complex우선순위, DAG, 또는 자원-네트워크 구조를 가짐.
ioe-complete만물인터넷-완전 분산 시나리오.
trace-backed명명된 실세계 워크로드 트레이스에 기반함.
domain-specific단일 운영 도메인에 맞춤됨.

증거 레이블

레이블용도
smoke테스트, 예제, 문서, 미리보기용 작은 결정론적 인스턴스.
exploratory아직 인용-뒷받침되거나 완전히 특성화되지 않은 그럴듯한 자료.
후보 증거 등급파일럿, 통계, 캠페인 게이트를 기다리는 인용-뒷받침 자료.
완전-캠페인 증거 등급인용, 특성화, 통계, 공개, 품질 게이트를 통과한 증거.

스모크 카탈로그는 결코 최종 평가 증거가 아닙니다. 그것들은 생성기, 검증, 특성화, 인용 검사, 영속성이 빠르게 작동함을 증명하기 위해 존재합니다. 포털 카탈로그와 다운로드는 이 작은 스모크 규모(삼-자원 풀)에서 각 연속체 패밀리를 미리봅니다; 공동-할당 패밀리는 그토록 작은 풀에서 서로소-자원 병렬성을 보일 수 없으므로, 그 독특한 구조는 연구-규모 속성입니다. build_continuum_full_catalog()는 각 패밀리를 그 선언된 연구 규모로 물질화합니다 — 공동-할당, 경합, 배치 구조가 진정으로 발현되는 더 큰 자원 풀과 태스크 수에서 — 연구-등급 벤치마크 번들을 위해.

분류법

분류법은 스케줄링 구조, 환경, 인프라 현실성, 목적 특징, 제약 특징, 불확실성, 그리고 동적성을 포괄합니다. 예시에는 DAG 워크플로우, 독립 태스크 배치, serverless 함수, 컨테이너 및 VM 통합, edge 및 cloud 환경, 공개 트레이스, 다중-목적 최적화, deadline, 데이터 지역성, churn, 그리고 동적 도착이 포함됩니다.

인용 매트릭스

벤치마크 주장은 CitationMatrix에 대해 검사됩니다. 후보 및 완전-캠페인 증거-등급 주장은 인용-뒷받침 출처를 참조하지 않는 한 검증에 실패합니다. 뒷받침되지 않은 자료는 증거가 추가될 때까지 exploratory로 남아야 합니다.

출처 집합은 default_citation_matrix()에서 안정적 출처 식별자, 해결 가능한 참조, 기록된 라이선스 태세와 함께 선언됩니다. 그것은 세 계층에 걸칩니다: 표준 조합-최적화 코퍼스(인용 및 링크만, 결코 번들되지 않음), 프로덕션 클러스터 트레이스, 그리고 광범위한 당대 실세계 Edge–Fog–Cloud-연속체 데이터셋 — GPU 및 machine-learning 클러스터 트레이스, 마이크로서비스 및 serverless 벤치마크 스위트, 과학-워크플로우 트레이스, 슈퍼컴퓨터 작업 트레이스, edge-placement 및 이동성 데이터셋, IoT 및 셀룰러-수요 데이터셋, 그리드 탄소 및 에너지 신호, 스트림-처리 워크로드, federated-learning 디바이스-참여 벤치마크, 확장-현실 시스템 테스트베드, 그리고 저-지구-궤도 위성-네트워크 트레이스:

Source idReferenceLicense posture
cloudsim-2011CloudSim학술
dynamic-cloudsim-2015DynamicCloudSim학술
edge-vision-2016Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges학술
or-library-1990OR-Library인용-및-링크-만
psplib-1997PSPLIB인용-및-링크-만
van-eynde-vanhoucke-2020Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling: benchmark datasets and decoupled scheduling인용-및-링크-만
taillard-1993Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems인용-및-링크-만
gonzalez-sahni-1976Open shop scheduling to minimize finish time학술
ruiz-vazquez-2010The hybrid flow shop scheduling problem학술
smt2020-2020SMT2020—A Semiconductor Manufacturing Testbedcite-and-link-only
hooker-2007Planning and Scheduling by Logic-Based Benders Decomposition학술
naderi-ruiz-2010The distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem학술
hall-sriskandarajah-1996A survey of machine scheduling problems with blocking and no-wait in process학술
minella-ruiz-2008A review and evaluation of multiobjective algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem학술
bartusch-moehring-1988Scheduling project networks with resource constraints and time windows학술
hatami-ruiz-2013The distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem학술
brandimarte-1993Flexible job shop by tabu search인용-및-링크-만
de-giovanni-pezzella-2010An improved genetic algorithm for the distributed and flexible job-shop scheduling problem학술
frontiercoFrontierCO: real-world large-scale ML-for-CO evaluationusable-and-citable
behnke-geiger-2012Test instances for the flexible job shop scheduling problem with work centerscite-and-link-only
naderi-roshanaei-2022Critical-path-search logic-based Benders decomposition for flexible job shop schedulingcite-and-link-only
hurink-jurisch-thole-1994Multi-purpose-machine job shop인용-및-링크-만
allahverdi-survey-2008A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs학술
allahverdi-survey-2015The third comprehensive survey on scheduling problems with setup times/costs학술
vallada-ruiz-2011A genetic algorithm for the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times학술
stg-task-graphsA standard task graph set for fair evaluation of multiprocessor scheduling algorithms표준
google-cluster-dataBorg cluster workload tracesCC-BY-4.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
twitter-cache-traces-2020Twitter in-memory cache cluster tracesCC-BY-4.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
m100-exadata-2023M100 ExaData supercomputer telemetry and job traceCC-BY-4.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
borg-2020Borg: the Next Generation학술
azure-public-datasetAzure Public DatasetCC-BY-4.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
alibaba-cluster-dataAlibaba cluster trace program인용-만
parallel-workloads-archiveParallel Workloads Archive인용-만
bitbrains-gwa-t12-2015GWA-T-12 Bitbrains business-critical VM trace인용-만
materna-gwa-t13-2014GWA-T-13 Materna enterprise datacenter VM trace인용-만
msr-cambridge-block-2008MSR Cambridge enterprise block-I/O traces (Write Off-Loading)인용-만
planetlab-workload-2012PlanetLab CPU-utilization consolidation traces인용-만
dspbench-2020DSPBench stream-processing benchmark suite학술
ifogsim-2017iFogSim toolkit학술
edgecloudsim-2018EdgeCloudSim학술
aerial-mec-survey-2022Aerial mobile edge computing survey학술
crush-2006CRUSH decentralized replica placement학술
smart-grid-dsm-2012Smart-grid demand-side management학술
liu-layland-1973Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment학술
philly-traces-2019Philly DNN-training cluster trace오픈, 사용 및 인용 가능
helios-traces-2021Helios GPU-datacenter trace오픈, 사용 및 인용 가능
acmetrace-2024AcmeTrace language-model-development cluster traceCC-BY-4.0
alibaba-pai-gpu-2020Alibaba PAI MLaaS GPU trace인용-만
azure-inference-trace-2023Azure model-inference serving traceCC-BY-4.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
deathstarbench-2019DeathStarBench microservice suiteApache-2.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
alibaba-microservice-characterization-2021Alibaba microservice characterization학술
train-ticket-benchmarkTrain-Ticket microservice benchmarkApache-2.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
sebs-2021SeBS serverless benchmark suiteBSD-3-Clause, 사용 및 인용 가능
functionbench-2019FunctionBench serverless workloads오픈, 사용 및 인용 가능
wfcommons-pegasus-instancesWfCommons scientific-workflow instances오픈, 사용 및 인용 가능
bharathi-synthetic-workflows-2008Synthetic scientific-workflow library오픈, 사용 및 인용 가능
nrel-eagle-jobs-2023NREL Eagle supercomputer job traceCC-BY-4.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
eua-datasetEdge-User-Allocation dataset오픈, 사용 및 인용 가능
shanghai-telecom-edgeShanghai Telecom access trace인용-만, 연구
lust-scenarioLuxembourg SUMO Traffic scenario학술, 사용 및 인용 가능
intel-lab-dataIntel Lab Data (54-node in-network aggregation)인용-및-링크-만
milano-cdr-2015Milan and Trentino urban datasetCC-BY-4.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
citylearn-v2CityLearn grid-interactive benchmarkMIT, 사용 및 인용 가능
electricity-maps-grid-ciElectricity Maps grid carbon-intensity오픈 파서 (MIT), 데이터 계층 상이
nexmark-benchmarkNEXMark streaming-query benchmark오픈, 사용 및 인용 가능
yahoo-streaming-benchmark-2016Yahoo Streaming BenchmarkApache-2.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
fedscale-2022FedScale federated-learning benchmarkApache-2.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
oort-2021Oort guided participant selectionApache-2.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
illixr-2021ILLIXR extended-reality testbedNCSA, 사용 및 인용 가능
lens-2024LENS LEO satellite-network tracesCC-BY-SA-4.0, 사용 및 인용 가능
tsn-craciunas-2016Scheduling Real-Time Communication in IEEE 802.1Qbv TSN학술
network-slicing-afolabi-2018Network Slicing and Softwarization: A Survey학술
digital-twin-diten-2022Survey on Digital Twin Edge Networks (DITEN) Toward 6G학술
videoedge-2018VideoEdge: Processing Camera Streams using Hierarchical Clusters학술
alpaserve-osdi-2023AlpaServe: Statistical Multiplexing with Model Parallelism for Deep Learning Serving학술
neurosurgeon-asplos-2017Neurosurgeon: Collaborative Intelligence Between the Cloud and Mobile Edge학술
occlum-asplos-2020Occlum: Secure and Efficient Multitasking Inside a Single Enclave of Intel SGX학술
confidential-edge-zobaed-2025Confidential Computing across Edge-to-Cloud for Machine Learning: A Survey Study학술
batteryless-lucia-pldi-2015A Simpler, Safer Programming and Execution Model for Intermittent Systems학술
batteryless-hester-sensys-2017The Future of Sensing is Batteryless, Intermittent, and Awesome학술
harvest-vms-ambati-osdi-2020Providing SLOs for Resource-Harvesting VMs in Cloud Platforms학술
spot-eviction-yang-www-2022Spot Virtual Machine Eviction Prediction in Microsoft Cloud학술
delay-scheduling-zaharia-eurosys-2010Delay Scheduling: A Simple Technique for Achieving Locality and Fairness in Cluster Scheduling학술
geo-analytics-iridium-pu-sigcomm-2015Low Latency Geo-distributed Data Analytics학술
coflow-chowdhury-hotnets-2012Coflow: A Networking Abstraction for Cluster Applications학술
varys-chowdhury-sigcomm-2014Efficient Coflow Scheduling with Varys학술
vllm-pagedattention-2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention학술
orca-serving-2022Orca: A Distributed Serving System for Transformer-Based Generative Models학술
pond-cxl-2023Pond: CXL-Based Memory Pooling Systems for Cloud Platforms학술
tpp-cxl-2023TPP: Transparent Page Placement for CXL-Enabled Tiered-Memory학술
ipipe-smartnic-2019Offloading Distributed Applications onto SmartNICs using iPipe학술
e3-smartnic-2019E3: Energy-Efficient Microservices on SmartNIC-Accelerated Servers학술
switch-transformers-2022Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity학술
lina-moe-2023Accelerating Distributed MoE Training and Inference with Lina학술
gpipe-2019GPipe: Efficient Training of Giant Neural Networks using Pipeline Parallelism학술
pipedream-2019PipeDream: Generalized Pipeline Parallelism for DNN Training학술
vestal-2007Preemptive Scheduling of Multi-criticality Systems with Varying Degrees of Execution Time Assurance학술
mixed-criticality-survey-2017A Survey of Research into Mixed Criticality Systems학술
valiant-bsp-1990A Bridging Model for Parallel Computation학술
pregel-2010Pregel: A System for Large-Scale Graph Processing학술
nfv-survey-2016Network Function Virtualization: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges학술
sfc-placement-2014Specifying and Placing Chains of Virtual Network Functions학술
ghodsi-drf-2011Dominant Resource Fairness: Fair Allocation of Multiple Resource Types학술
gandiva-2018Gandiva: Introspective Cluster Scheduling for Deep Learning학술
calvin-2012Calvin: Fast Distributed Transactions for Partitioned Database Systems학술
spanner-2012Spanner: Google's Globally-Distributed Database학술
amorphos-2018Sharing, Protection, and Compatibility for Reconfigurable Fabric with AmorphOS학술
fpga-online-placement-2003Online Scheduling and Placement of Real-Time Tasks to Partially Reconfigurable Devices학술
imprecise-computation-1991Algorithms for Scheduling Imprecise Computations학술
branchynet-2016BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networks학술
moldable-parallelizable-tasks-1992Approximate Algorithms for Scheduling Parallelizable Tasks학술
serverless-rise-2019The Rise of Serverless Computing학술
gang-scheduling-1995Parallel Job Scheduling: Issues and Approaches학술
large-minibatch-sgd-2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hour학술
fisher-thompson-1963Probabilistic learning combinations of local job-shop scheduling rules인용-및-링크-만
lawrence-1984Resource constrained project scheduling: an experimental investigation of heuristic scheduling techniques (Supplement)인용-및-링크-만
adams-balas-zawack-1988The shifting bottleneck procedure for job shop scheduling표준
applegate-cook-1991A computational study of the job-shop scheduling problem표준
storer-wu-vaccari-1992New search spaces for sequencing problems with application to job shop scheduling표준
yamada-nakano-1992A genetic algorithm applicable to large-scale job-shop problems인용-및-링크-만
demirkol-mehta-uzsoy-1998Benchmarks for shop scheduling problems표준
dauzere-peres-paulli-1997General multiprocessor job-shop scheduling using tabu search표준
vallada-ruiz-framinan-2015New hard benchmark for flowshop scheduling problems minimising makespan표준
ruiz-maroto-alcaraz-2005Flowshop scheduling with sequence dependent setup times using advanced metaheuristics표준
van-peteghem-vanhoucke-2014Metaheuristics for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem on new dataset instances표준
debels-vanhoucke-2007A decomposition-based genetic algorithm for the resource-constrained project-scheduling problem표준
cicirello-wtsds-benchmarkWeighted tardiness scheduling with sequence-dependent setups: a benchmark library표준
crauwels-potts-vanwassenhove-1998Local search heuristics for the single machine total weighted tardiness scheduling problem학술
van-hoorn-2018The current state of bounds on benchmark instances of the job-shop scheduling problem학술
scheduleopt-benchmarksScheduleOpt benchmark collection: JSPLib and FJSPLib instances with verified bounds표준
zenodo-pfsp-bks-2021Permutation flow-shop: best-known makespans and schedules for Taillard and VRF benchmarks표준
solutionsupdate-ugent-rcpspBest known results for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem산업
cloud-datasets-survey-2025Public Datasets for Cloud Computing: A Comprehensive Survey학술
fog-placement-survey-2023Fog/edge node placement survey학술
topcuoglu-heft-2002Performance-Effective and Low-Complexity Task Scheduling for Heterogeneous Computing학술
canon-dag-bias-2019A Comparison of Random Task Graph Generation Methods for Scheduling Problems학술
ifogsim2-2022iFogSim2 extended fog/edge simulator학술
rl4co-2023RL4CO reinforcement-learning-for-CO benchmark학술

정준 참조 스위트

default_reference_suites()의 레지스트리는 각 범용 스케줄링 패밀리가 앵커하는 정준 발행 인스턴스 스위트를 기록합니다: 정체성, 패밀리, 인스턴스 수, 검색 포인터, 그리고 그 스위트의 경계를 발행하는 최선-기지-해 트래커. 고전 스위트는 인용 및 링크만 됩니다 — DispatchAtlas는 제3자 인스턴스 파일을 결코 번들하거나 재배포하지 않습니다.

스위트패밀리인스턴스다운로드BKS 트래커
fisher-thompsonjob-shop3OR-Libraryvan-hoorn-2018, scheduleopt-benchmarks
lawrencejob-shop40JSPLIB 미러van-hoorn-2018, scheduleopt-benchmarks
adams-balas-zawackjob-shop5JSPLIB 미러van-hoorn-2018, scheduleopt-benchmarks
applegate-cook-orbjob-shop10JSPLIB 미러van-hoorn-2018, scheduleopt-benchmarks
storer-wu-vaccarijob-shop20JSPLIB 미러van-hoorn-2018, scheduleopt-benchmarks
yamada-nakanojob-shop4JSPLIB 미러van-hoorn-2018, scheduleopt-benchmarks
taillard-jspjob-shop80JSPLIB 미러van-hoorn-2018, scheduleopt-benchmarks
demirkol-dmujob-shop80JSPLIB 미러scheduleopt-benchmarks
brandimarte-mk유연 job-shop15SchedulingLab 미러scheduleopt-benchmarks
hurink-fjsp유연 job-shop198SchedulingLab 미러scheduleopt-benchmarks
dauzere-peres-paulli유연 job-shop18SchedulingLab 미러scheduleopt-benchmarks
taillard-pfsp플로우샵120OR-Libraryzenodo-pfsp-bks-2021
vrf-pfsp플로우샵480SOA 그룹 사이트zenodo-pfsp-bks-2021
sdst-taillard-ruiz셋업 플로우샵480SOA 그룹 사이트최선해가 인스턴스와 함께 제공됨
cicirello-wt-sds기계 스케줄링120Harvard Dataversecicirello-wtsds-benchmark
or-library-smtwt기계 스케줄링375OR-Librarycrauwels-potts-vanwassenhove-1998
vallada-ruiz-upmsp기계 스케줄링1640 (보고됨)SOA 그룹 사이트
psplibRCPSP2040PSPLIB 사이트psplib-1997
mmlibRCPSP4320 (보고됨)OR&S 랜딩 페이지solutionsupdate-ugent-rcpsp
rg300RCPSP480OR&S 랜딩 페이지solutionsupdate-ugent-rcpsp

번들된 파서가 있는 스위트(표준 job-shop 텍스트, Taillard 플로우샵 매트릭스, .fjs 유연 job-shop, WfCommons WfFormat JSON)는 운영자가 다운로드하여 로컬 resources/ 트리 아래에 배치한 파일로부터 load_reference_suite(suite_id, instances_root=...)로 수집됩니다. 수집은 전적으로 오프라인으로 실행되고, 합성 생성기와 동일한 검증, 특성화, 해싱, 출처 봉투를 재사용하며, 모든 문제에 그 suite_idupstream_instance_id를 날인합니다. 레지스트리-전용 스위트는 번들된 파서 없이 그 인용과 검색 포인터와 함께 기록됩니다.

최선-기지-해 레지스트리

인스턴스-별 최선-기지 값은 DispatchAtlas와 함께 결코 배포되지 않습니다. 운영자는 그것들을 사설 resources/benchmarks/bks/ 디렉터리 아래 JSON 파일로 수집합니다 — 스위트당 한 파일, 각각 schema_version, suite_id, 트래커 source_id, 검색 날짜, 그리고 값 엔트리(인스턴스 id, 목적, 값, 최적-또는-상한 종류, 선택적 하한)를 지닙니다. load_best_known_registry는 모든 파일을 참조 스위트와 인용 매트릭스에 대해 검증하고 미지의 스위트, 미지의 트래커, 중복 엔트리, 또는 비일관 경계에서 닫혀 실패합니다. 수집된 레지스트리 없이 상대-편차 메트릭은 그저 사용 불가입니다 — 결코 부분적으로 계산되지 않으며, 어떤 최선-기지 값도 어떤 공개 표면에도 나타나지 않습니다.

보정 발산

합성 범용 패밀리는 그 생성 방식을 재현한다고 주장하지 않으면서 정준 스위트에 앵커됩니다. 알려진 발산은 숨겨지지 않고 문서화됩니다:

패밀리발행 관례합성 관례
셋업 플로우샵처리 시간의 10/50/100/125%인 SDST-Taillard 셋업세 셋업 패밀리, 비용 = 패밀리 + 1
기계 스케줄링 (R||Cmax)U[1,100] 지속시간 클래스와 상관-기계 변형쌍-별 속도 계수 0.5–2.0

발행 관례에 대한 비교는 합성 패밀리가 아니라 수집된 정준 인스턴스를 경유합니다.

특성화

각 물질화된 문제는 다음에 대한 정규화된 기술자를 받습니다:

  • 기회 밀도
  • 호환성 희소성
  • 경합 및 과부하
  • 의존 깊이
  • 통신 압력
  • 셋업 강도
  • 부하 편향 및 이질성
  • 목적 충돌
  • 불확실성 및 동적성
  • 솔버 민감도

현실-격차 브리지

각 완전-캠페인 증거-등급 프로파일은 현실-격차 브리지를 선언합니다: 그 상태(synthetic, calibrated-synthetic, trace-backed, 또는 externally-sourced), 보정 증거, 도메인 시나리오, 전이 및 교란 커버리지, 그리고 잔여 현실-격차 위험. 완전-캠페인 증거 등급으로의 승격은 전이 및 교란 커버리지가 선언되지 않는 한 닫혀 실패하며, calibrated-synthetic 프로파일은 그것이 보정하는 대상 trace-backed 참조를 명명해야 합니다. Calibrated-synthetic 패밀리는 그 트레이스 참조를 명시적으로 명명합니다; 수집된 정준 스위트는 externally-sourced 브리지를 지니고, WfCommons 어댑터는 최초의 외부-파싱 trace-backed 인스턴스 출처로서 distribution_distance_score에 실제 trace-backed 참조 다리를 제공합니다.

명명된 보정 메트릭은 calibrated-synthetic 프로파일의 특성화 특징 분포와 그 trace-backed 참조 인스턴스의 그것 사이의 특징-별 1-Wasserstein(흙-운반자) 거리를 보고합니다. 특징-별 거리는 단일 현실-격차 점수로 집계됩니다; 최대-발산 임계값(기본 0.25) 위의 점수는 프로파일이 그 참조에서 너무 멀리 표류하여 보정에 실패했음을 의미합니다. 메트릭은 물질화된 인스턴스와 명명된 참조 트레이스로부터 재현 가능합니다.

from dispatchatlas.bench import (
    build_smoke_catalog,
    metrics_from_instance_set,
    distribution_distance_score,
)
 
catalogs = {c.config.profile_id: c for c in build_smoke_catalog()}
synthetic = metrics_from_instance_set(catalogs["cloud-edge-capacity"])
reference = metrics_from_instance_set(catalogs["workflow-dag"])
score = distribution_distance_score(
    synthetic, reference, reference_trace_id="google-cluster-data"
)

계층화 및 부분집합 선택

difficulty_score는 경합, 과부하, 의존-깊이, 솔버-민감도 기술자를 정규화 난이도 점수로 집계하고, stratify_instances는 물질화된 인스턴스를 저, 중, 고 난이도 계층으로 비닝합니다. select_benchmark_subset은 패밀리, 프로파일 클래스, 난이도 계층으로 필터링된 결정론적 부분집합을 문제 식별자로 정렬하여 선택을 재현 가능하게 합니다.

스모크 카탈로그

from dispatchatlas.bench import build_smoke_catalog, smoke_benchmark_provider
 
catalogs = build_smoke_catalog(root_seed=20260527)
provider = smoke_benchmark_provider(root_seed=20260527)
 
first_problem = provider.get_problem(provider.list_problem_ids()[0])

번들된 스모크 카탈로그는 두 distributed-computing 패밀리(cloud/edge 독립-태스크 및 workflow DAG)를 열네 범용 스케줄링 패밀리(기계 스케줄링, job-shop, 유연 job-shop, 순열 플로우샵, 순서-의존 셋업 플로우샵, RCPSP, 오픈샵, 하이브리드 플로우샵, 분산 순열 플로우샵, 노-웨이트 플로우샵, 블로킹 플로우샵, 분산 조립 플로우샵, 다목적 순열 플로우샵, RCPSP/max)와 co-equal한 동급으로 포함합니다. 각 인스턴스는 루트 시드로부터 결정론적이며, 인용-뒷받침 생성기 메타데이터를 사용하면서 스모크 개발 자료로 레이블된 채 유지됩니다.

후보 완전 카탈로그

후보 완전-캠페인 카탈로그는 더 큰 설정 문제 수와 더 엄격한 증거 레이블로 동일한 물질화 경로를 사용합니다:

from dispatchatlas.bench import build_full_catalog, full_benchmark_provider
 
catalogs = build_full_catalog(root_seed=2026052713, problem_count_per_profile=30)
provider = full_benchmark_provider(
    root_seed=2026052713,
    problem_count_per_profile=30,
)

그 완전-캠페인 증거-등급 카탈로그는 인용-뒷받침되고, 특성화되고, 해시-연결되며, 캠페인, 공개, 발행 게이트가 특정 주장을 승격할 때까지 여전히 보정 증거로 레이블됩니다.